Comments on: Player Ratings vs Manchester City

By: KING2453

KING2453 — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:33:29 +0000

How the hell can Huddlestone get a better rating then Palacios???

Must be a wind up? This guy is consistently bad and often we look like we are always playing with 10 men! Wilson does so much work to cover for this lazy lump of a fairy! He doesnt tackle, he doesnt score that many, he doesnt open up play, he has no pace, he often looses the ball or misplaces a pass… so can someone tell me what he adds to this team??? Next time you guys go to a game, look at what he does for 90 min and you will know what i mean….

By: Jim

Jim — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:12:41 +0000

Both centre mids were off the boil last night .every time Wilson got the ball he gave it away he’s not comfortable on the ball niko and benny were immense on the left Dawson was our rock

By: Stoney

Stoney — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:50:16 +0000

Don’t know how you rate the HUD higher than Wilson. HUD was off the pace all night. Wilson was everywhere snapping at their heels. Open your eyes.

By: Mrs. Crouch

Mrs. Crouch — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:40:51 +0000

I would have to disagree with the Crouch and BAE rating. First, I think BAE deserves an 8. Every time he received the ball in the backfield, he neatly pushed the ball forward despite the pressure. That has to be one of his best games.
And for Crouch, even though he did have a few lay offs with his head that were nice, every time the ball fell to his feet it seemed to trip him up. Some of the worst ball handling I have seen in a while.
BAE 8
Crouch 6
Thank you